Lindsay Parvis co-authors article published in Maryland Association for Justice’s Trial Reporter

P. Lindsay Parvis, a partner in the firm, along with Heather Sweren, a partner at Brodsky Renehan Pearlstein & Bouquet, Chartered, recently authored an article titled “Developments in Family Law in 2015” published in the Winter 2015 publication of the Maryland Association for Justice’s Trial Reporter. Highlights of the article include a discussion of family law legislation and rules of civil procedure that went into effect in 2015, new rules going into effect in 2016, and appellate and attorney general opinions issued in 2015.

To read the full article, please click the following link:

Trial Reporter Article

Heather Collier and Erik Arena Speaking on Child-Related Tax Issues

On February 25, 2016, Heather Collier, Erik Arena, and tax attorney Eric Rollinger of Stein, Sperling, Bennett, De Jong, Driscoll, PC, will be speaking before the Family Law Section of the Bar Association for Montgomery County, Maryland, on the topic: “Child-related Tax Issues—What are they and what do you do with them?” This program will cover a number of tax issues related to filing status(es), dependency exemptions, and related tax credits and deductions, which should be on every family law attorney’s radar as a part of any case involving children. Both Heather and Erik are excited to share their knowledge and insights with their fellow colleagues in February.

Attorneys at DHHW named in Super Lawyers Magazine

Patrick W. Dragga, Jeffrey Hannon, Kevin G. Hessler, Vincent M. Wills, Lindsay Parvis, Heather Collier, and Erik P. Arena were each named as a 2016 Maryland Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers Magazine. The Super
Lawyers selection process is based on peer nominations, third-party independent research conducted across 12 different categories by an attorney-led research team, and a peer review by those attorneys who received the highest total ratings in each practice area. Only 5% of the lawyers practicing in the State of Maryland are named to the Super Lawyers list.

Patrick W. Dragga was also named as one of the 2016 Maryland “Top 100” lawyers by Super Lawyers Magazine.

Please click on the link below for the full article:


What’s in a name?

Volume 1

If requested in a divorce, a spouse will be restored to his or her given birth name or any other former name the party wishes to use.  This name restoration cannot be stopped by the ex-spouse, nor can an ex-spouse require it of the other.  There are two conditions that must be met:

1)  the current name was taken upon the marriage at issue and the party no long wishes to use it; and,

2) the request for restoration to a former name is not for any fraudulent, immoral, or illegal purpose.

The request can be made in a complaint or counterclaim, in an answer, or in person at the divorce hearing or trial.  It is a formal name change, which will allows the party to update his or her driver’s license, social security card, and accounts with a copy of the judgment of absolute divorce stating the restored name.  This does not, however, allow a party to take an entirely new name.

This process is streamlined when compared with going through a separate action to change one’s name.  This streamlined process is only available when a divorce is granted and must occur at the time of the divorce.  If not, a party will need to file a separate petition for name change in order to change his or her name afterward.

The decision to resume one’s former name – or not – at the time of the divorce is a personal one.  It can be influenced by attachment to the married versus family names, children with the same last name, among other reasons.  Fortunately, if one does not resume a former name at the divorce, one can do so after the fact, although more steps, time, and expense are involved.

Continue to Volume 2 of What's in a Name?

By: P. Lindsay Parvis

Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland Announces “One Judge One Family” Case Assignments

Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland Announces “One Judge One Family” Case Assignments starting January 1, 2016

Currently, the majority of Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland cases can lack continuity in the court because multiple judges may hear and decide different portions of the case.  The One Judge One Family (1F1J) initiative identifies high conflict and complex cases that would benefit from being assigned to one judge.  A 1F1J case assignment will pull in all cases between the parties/involving the same child(ren), such as divorce, custody, child support, guardianship of a minor, domestic violence, and juvenile matters, to be handled by one team.  The team will consist of one judge, one magistrate, and one case manager.

Rules of Civil Procedure - Effective January 1, 2016

Two rules of civil procedure will go into effect January 1, 2016 that directly impact family law matters.

The first - 5-803 – Hearsay Exceptions: Unavailability of Declarant Not Required – applies in domestic violence protective order cases in which a court referred the case for a child protective services (CPS) investigation. Specifically 5-803(b)(8)(A)(iv) regards admissibility, at a final protective order hearing, of factual findings reported to a court in a CPS report, provided the parties have had a fair opportunity to review the report. It is the current practice in such situations for CPS to prepare and submit the report to the court, for the parties/their attorneys to review the report at court the day of the final protective order hearing, and for CPS not to send the investigator to court as a witness. The lack of witness could result in a CPS report not being admitted. The addition of this new rule will allow the CPS report to be received into evidence in the absence of a live witness from CPS.

New grounds for divorce in Maryland – Mutual Consent

As of October 1, 2015 there is a new ground for absolute divorce in Maryland.

Parties can now obtain an absolute divorce based on mutual consent if the parties do not have minor children in common, the parties submit to the court a written and signed settlement agreement resolving the parties’ alimony and property rights and neither party files a pleading to set aside the settlement agreement prior to the divorce hearing. Both parties must appear before the court at the absolute divorce hearing.

Process for filing for Divorce based on Mutual Consent in Montgomery County:

When filing for divorce based on Mutual Consent, the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland is requiring that the written and signed settlement agreement be submitted with the complaint and that the following new Joint Request for Uncontested Divorce Hearing form (exclusively for Mutual Consent grounds) be filed:

By: Christina P. DeVault


Transmission or viewing of this website is not intended to create, nor does it constitute, an attorney-client relationship between the viewer and Dragga Hannon, LLP.

This web site has been created for general informational purposes only. You should not consider the contents of this website as legal advice or legal opinion. The material contained in this site is intended to be current, complete and up-to-date, but it is not promised or guaranteed to be so. Each case is different, and the past record of the Firm's successes, and those of its attorneys, is not a guarantee of a favorable result in any future case. We will, however, devote our full attention to your case. You should not act or rely on any information contained in this site without first seeking advice of counsel.

Individuals should not contact Dragga Hannon, LLP electronically until a formal agreement has been reached between the party and the Firm to handle a particular matter. Do not send confidential or sensitive information. Email may not be secure, and there is a risk that your communication could be illegally intercepted. Do not send us information until you speak with one of our lawyers and get authorization to send that information to us.

This website is maintained at the offices of Dragga Hannon, LLP in Rockville, Maryland. It is for general information purposes only, is not intended as advertising, and neither solicits business nor offers legal advice. Attorneys at Dragga Hannon, LLP do not seek to practice law in any state, territory or foreign country where they are not authorized to do so. The attorney biography page indicates all states and districts in which our attorneys are licensed to practice. Please direct your comments and questions to our office at 301-340-9090.