What role does parent disability play in Maryland child custody decisions?

As with all child custody decisions, much (if not all) depends upon the trial judge deciding the case.

But since 2016, Family Law Article §9-107 provides a framework for judges deciding child custody cases involving parent disability.

This follows the Commission on Child Custody Decision Making’s conclusion that “Maryland law can better ensure that child custody determinations involving parents with mental health issues or sensory or physical disabilities are handled in a fair and even manner based on actual evidence and not presumed limitations.”

§9-107 defines “disability” as: “A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of an individual’s major life activities; a record of having a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of an individual’s major life activities; or, being regarded as having a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of an individual’s major life activities.”

§9-107 creates a shifting burden of proof: first for a parent alleging that the disability affects the best interest of the child to prove this, and if burden met, then for the other parent to prove that “supportive parenting services” would prevent a finding that the disability affects the child’s best interests.

“Supportive parenting services” are defined as: “services that may assist an individual with a disability in the effective use of techniques and methods to enable the individual to discharge the individual’s responsibilities to a child as successfully as an individual who does not have a disability, including nonvisual techniques for individuals who are blind. In short, services that assist the disabled individual to parent as successfully as a person who is not disabled.”

Finally, if a court finds that a disability affects the child’s best interests and denies or limits custody or visitation, the court must specifically state in writing the basis and reason that supportive parenting services are not a reasonable accommodation and make a record that the disability affects the best interest of the child.

§9-107 does not apply to parents whose children are removed from their custody by Child Protective Services (such as recently in the news regarding the Oregon couple allegedly due to their low IQs).

Some resources for parents needing accommodations to access Maryland Courts:

ADA Procedure – Public User Requests

Request for Accommodation Court Form

Administrative Office of the Courts’ FAQs & Other Information

Disability Rights Maryland (formerly Disability Law Center)

Since 2002, Lindsay Parvis has represented clients in Maryland custody, divorce, and marital matters. She negotiates, litigates, and advocates for the best interests of her clients, whether in contested litigation, uncontested settlement, or premarital and other agreements. Her clients are not only spouses and parents, but also children whose interests she is appointed by the court to represent in contested custody litigation. She is a graduate of Mount Holyoke and University of Baltimore School of Law. Lindsay strives to improve Maryland law in the General Assembly, volunteering her time to monitor, advocate, and educate about legislative developments in family law. You can follow her on Linked InFacebook, and LindsayParvis.com and subscribe to her Newsletter for discussion, news, and developments in Maryland family law.


Transmission or viewing of this website is not intended to create, nor does it constitute, an attorney-client relationship between the viewer and Dragga Hannon, LLP.

This web site has been created for general informational purposes only. You should not consider the contents of this website as legal advice or legal opinion. The material contained in this site is intended to be current, complete and up-to-date, but it is not promised or guaranteed to be so. Each case is different, and the past record of the Firm's successes, and those of its attorneys, is not a guarantee of a favorable result in any future case. We will, however, devote our full attention to your case. You should not act or rely on any information contained in this site without first seeking advice of counsel.

Individuals should not contact Dragga Hannon, LLP electronically until a formal agreement has been reached between the party and the Firm to handle a particular matter. Do not send confidential or sensitive information. Email may not be secure, and there is a risk that your communication could be illegally intercepted. Do not send us information until you speak with one of our lawyers and get authorization to send that information to us.

This website is maintained at the offices of Dragga Hannon, LLP in Rockville, Maryland. It is for general information purposes only, is not intended as advertising, and neither solicits business nor offers legal advice. Attorneys at Dragga Hannon, LLP do not seek to practice law in any state, territory or foreign country where they are not authorized to do so. The attorney biography page indicates all states and districts in which our attorneys are licensed to practice. Please direct your comments and questions to our office at 301-340-9090.